At 7:54 AM -0800 3/3/99, Jason Dawes wrote:
>At 08:37 AM 3/3/99 +0100, you wrote:
>>I guess you cant copyright an idea
>
>But you _can_ patent it.
You patent processes, not ideas. You copyright expressions, not ideas. I
don't know of any legal protection at all for ideas. (And I think that's a
good thing!)
Most of the work in generating a pattent application seems to be turning an
idea into a process-oriented description. Of course, that's also most of
the work required to exploit an idea. :)
--Bob
- Re: copyright?? Erica Sadun
- RE: copyright?? Mike Pellegrino
- Re: copyright?? Alan Pinstein
- RE: copyright?? Richard Hartman
- Re: copyright?? Jason Dawes
- Re: copyright?? Brougham
- Re: copyright?? Michael Yam
- Re: copyright?? Alan Pinstein
- RE: copyright?? Richard Hartman
- Re: copyright?? Dave Lippincott
- Re: copyright?? Bob Ebert
- Re: copyright?? Michael Yam
- Re: copyright?? Steve Sabram
- Re: copyright?? Daniel McCarty
- Re: copyright?? James Walters
- Re: copyright?? Kenneth Albanowski
- Re: copyright?? Kenneth Albanowski
- Re: copyright?? Kenneth Albanowski
- Re: copyright?? Michael Yam
- RE: copyright?? Chris Faherty
- Re: copyright?? Michael Yam
