hej!

  my recent experience is that the double buffering techniques
  do not work in GCC.. i have not got a copy of code warrior
  (and i am running win98 - so i cannot download the preview)
  so i dont know if it is gcc, or not.

  i have scanned the code - but i cannot seem to locate the 
  error.

  even simply creating an offscreen image, then destroying
  it (freeing it) causes the palm to crash.

  you can see the source here:

    http://www.hig.se/~ardiri/development/palmIII/index.html

  if anyone can check this code out? (maybe compile it on
  code warrior?) it would be greatly appreciated.

  i need to know if i need to change development tools.
  (although i hate windows and crappy user interfaces).
  gcc and make are perfect for what i want, and it also
  means i can compile on linux, win95 and solaris (without
  any hassles).

  cheers.

az.
--
Aaron Ardiri 
Lecturer                       http://www.hig.se/~ardiri/
University-College i G�vle     mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SE 801 76 G�vle SWEDEN       
Tel: +46 26 64 87 38           Fax: +46 26 64 87 88
Mob: +46 70 352 8192           A/H: +46 26 10 16 11

On Wed, 7 Apr 1999, Ray Rodrick wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I would like to know as well - I am happy with GCC (W95) but see many
> complaints and problems posted about CodeWarrior.
> 
> I have a copy of V4 and have just received my V5 free update, but since
> there seems to be many outstanding issues, many of which it seems are
> not going to be fixed until V6, I have not bothered to use it.   I feel
> reluctant to part with more money to get fixes when I am happy with GCC.
> 
> Anyone like to comment ?
> 
> Regards,
> Ray
> 
> george williams wrote:
> 
> > Perhaps a question for hardcore developers:
> >
> > I've been using gcc with a minimal emacs dev
> > environment and it works fine.  Are there
> > any great reasons to move to a prettier dev
> > solution like MetroWorks?
> >
> > gw.
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to