Aaron,
Just a thought - Are you using CALLBACK_PROLOG/EPILOG in your callbacks !
Regards,
Ray
Aaron Ardiri wrote:
> hej!
>
> my recent experience is that the double buffering techniques
> do not work in GCC.. i have not got a copy of code warrior
> (and i am running win98 - so i cannot download the preview)
> so i dont know if it is gcc, or not.
>
> i have scanned the code - but i cannot seem to locate the
> error.
>
> even simply creating an offscreen image, then destroying
> it (freeing it) causes the palm to crash.
>
> you can see the source here:
>
> http://www.hig.se/~ardiri/development/palmIII/index.html
>
> if anyone can check this code out? (maybe compile it on
> code warrior?) it would be greatly appreciated.
>
> i need to know if i need to change development tools.
> (although i hate windows and crappy user interfaces).
> gcc and make are perfect for what i want, and it also
> means i can compile on linux, win95 and solaris (without
> any hassles).
>
> cheers.
>
> az.
> --
> Aaron Ardiri
> Lecturer http://www.hig.se/~ardiri/
> University-College i G�vle mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> SE 801 76 G�vle SWEDEN
> Tel: +46 26 64 87 38 Fax: +46 26 64 87 88
> Mob: +46 70 352 8192 A/H: +46 26 10 16 11
>
> On Wed, 7 Apr 1999, Ray Rodrick wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to know as well - I am happy with GCC (W95) but see many
> > complaints and problems posted about CodeWarrior.
> >
> > I have a copy of V4 and have just received my V5 free update, but since
> > there seems to be many outstanding issues, many of which it seems are
> > not going to be fixed until V6, I have not bothered to use it. I feel
> > reluctant to part with more money to get fixes when I am happy with GCC.
> >
> > Anyone like to comment ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ray
> >
> > george williams wrote:
> >
> > > Perhaps a question for hardcore developers:
> > >
> > > I've been using gcc with a minimal emacs dev
> > > environment and it works fine. Are there
> > > any great reasons to move to a prettier dev
> > > solution like MetroWorks?
> > >
> > > gw.
> >
> >
> >
