That's why you use their DateType function and their routines for grabbing the date, so when they change the functions, your software will still work! Oh sorry -- I couldn't resist. I have heard this so many times over the last two years, and I figure David Fedor hasn't made it into work yet... Elia -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Zucker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 1999 8:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? You may not be using your XT, but you're probably still using a DOS-based OS. -Dan
- y2k bug inherent in DateType? Michael P. Hutchens, MA
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? krollin
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Steve Patt
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Aaron Ardiri
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? krollin
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Daniel Zucker
- RE: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Terry Carnes
- RE: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Fawcett, Mitch
- RE: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Elia J. Freedman
- RE: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Aaron Ardiri
- RE: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Alan Johnson
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Chuck Christensen
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Steve Patt
- RE: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Shaolin Hu
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Marcel Guldemond
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Alan Pinstein
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Steve Patt
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Kenneth Albanowski
- RE: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Tom Zerucha
