On Wed, 7 Apr 1999, Marcel Guldemond wrote: > Say you have a survey that's asking a very old person when their parents > were born? Or currently, for that matter, what if your survey is asking > someone who is 98 years old what they're birthdate is? It could easily > go back that far. FWIW, my exerience in doing some related work (astronomy calculations) is that the OS date/time routines are generally not of much use in any case. (Speaking generally here, not just of PalmOS). Whenever I need to do such things, I end up rolling my own code. Never mind whether y2k is the reason of the OS limitations. I expect any y2k limit on the Palm devices will be hitting the common applications that _do_ use the OS facilities (Datebook, ToDo), much harder then special-purpose survey or calculation apps that have special goals and needs. -- Kenneth Albanowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED], CIS: 70705,126)
- RE: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Fawcett, Mitch
- RE: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Elia J. Freedman
- RE: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Aaron Ardiri
- RE: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Alan Johnson
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Chuck Christensen
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Steve Patt
- RE: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Shaolin Hu
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Marcel Guldemond
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Alan Pinstein
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Steve Patt
- RE: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Kenneth Albanowski
- RE: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Tom Zerucha
- RE: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Aaron Ardiri
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Aaron Ardiri
- y2k bug inherent in DateType? Michael Hutchens
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Aaron Ardiri
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? krollin
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Michael S. Davis
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Aaron Ardiri
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Aaron Ardiri
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? krollin
