Re: OS 3.1+ change (getnextdatabase)?

[Anonymous]

>Did DmFindFirst/NextDatabase reverse the order in which they return the
>"next" database from 3.0 to 3.1?  I know I had to change a flag to get it
>to work, but it appears if I load databases A, B, and C, they are returned
>in reverse order in 3.1.

There were considerable code changes in that area of the OS in 3.1, to make
things faster.  I wouldn't be surprised if the order changed - I don't
think we had guaranteed any order, though.

-David Fedor
Palm Developer Support