On Fri, 25 Jun 1999 12:50:39 -0700, you wrote: >I hope you're using the newer docs, called 3.1 prerelease or something like >that. They're much improved over the 3.0 docs. A newer copy of them will >be posted pretty soon. Aagghh, I knew this would happen since I just sprung for the printed 3.0 docs! :-) BTW, It's amazing to me just how nice it's been to have the OS docs in a bound hardcopy of smallish format (i.e. smaller than 8.5x11). I wish I had spent the money to buy them from fatbrain.com when they were first printed... Oh, and if we are talking about electronic formats, I'd like to cast my vote for the Visual SlickEdit API format. I use it's tagging feature to let me "jump" to the prototypes in the headers, having the docs accessible the same way would be fantastic. Don Meyer Stormgate Communications
- Documentation errors (was: Re: StrAToI() out of b... pete moss
- Re: Documentation errors (was: Re: StrAToI()... Anonymous
- Re: Documentation errors (was: Re: StrAToI()... Anonymous
- RE: Documentation errors (was: Re: StrAToI()... Anonymous
- Re: Documentation errors (was: Re: StrAToI()... Anonymous
- Re: Documentation errors (was: Re: StrAToI()... Aaron Ardiri
- Re: Documentation errors (was: Re: StrAToI()... Stormgate Communications
- Re: Documentation errors (was: Re: StrAToI()... Anonymous
- RE: Documentation errors (was: Re: StrAToI()... Anonymous
- RE: Documentation errors (was: Re: StrAToI()... Anonymous
- RE: Documentation errors (was: Re: StrAToI()... Bryan Nystrom
- Re: Documentation errors (was: Re: StrAToI()... Stormgate Communications
- Re: Documentation errors (was: Re: StrAToI()... Stormgate Communications
- Re: Documentation errors (was: Re: StrAToI()... Dave Lippincott
- RE: Documentation errors (was: Re: StrAToI()... Richard Hartman
