In the spirit of AOL, "me too". I just received back my rejection.
Of course, it does not mention WHAT is wrong with it...just that is IS
wrong. Oh, well...luckily it seems that nobody is actually BUYING the
Palm VII so our lack of support for it should not hurt us too badly.
--frank
On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 09:52:27PM -0400, Chris Faherty wrote:
> On 18-Jul-99 Stephen Johnson wrote:
>
> > After a 8 weeks turn around time I just received an email about my
> > application for a debug ROM. The email claimed there was something wrong
> > with my form (but its up to me to figure out exactly what that might be)
> > and included 2 pages of instructions. At this rate I figure I'll have the
> > ROM in 18-24 months.
>
> You know when I first read this I kinda chuckled at your misfortune.. :) but
> as it turns out I just received the same email in response to my application
> I sent in a couple of weeks ago (July 9th). Now this may sound strange but
> this situation has really blown a vein for me, and in fact I had to calm down
> a bit before writing this -- because I have never been this angry in my
> entire life!
>
> My "guess" is that I didn't fill in a "Prototype Site" blank which I honestly
> didn't even see until I just printed the forms out again. Now the (7/20/99)
> forms have instructions thankfully. So I'll assume that I didn't fill that
> blank in, and now I have to mail these forms into Palm again. But what is
> the deal with it taking 14 days just to tell me I missed a blank! Assuming
> that's what happened, which I don't really know because all they sent was a
> blanket email that doesn't tell me specifically what was wrong with my
> application.
>
> I don't mind filling in the forms again, heck I don't even mind admitting
> that I screwed up. But can't we get a 24-72 hour turnaround on this stuff.
> Two weeks (yes 14 days!) is ridiculous. Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't
> this just involve verifying the form and pushing a button to give me Pavilion
> access?
>
>
> /* Chris Faherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, finger for PGP */
>
>
