>>> "Michael S. Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/07/99 07:55AM >>>
> Maybe it is the Debug ROMs that required the signing.
Oops. Yes, permission was required to be allowed to download Palm Computer ROMS for
versions that I do not have. I think that in development versions of POSE were
included in the permission.
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for the note.
JPF said
>>I have access to the POSE files through having signed the license
>>agreement.
Keith said
> Actually, you have access to it because it's freely downloadable for
> anybody, binaries and source code. I don't know what you signed, but it
> wasn't for Poser.
>>Is it acceptable use to use POSE for training?
I guess my question is, is it acceptable to use POSE and a ROM for training in cases
where the ROM is only available to me through the license
agreement?
Keith said
> I don't see why not. What problems are you thinking of?
I had to get license approval to access the ROM's and the wording was such that other
developers from my company, in order to use the same files needed to sign the license
agreement. The difference, in the present case, is that I'm not asking for developer
permission, only display permission. In addition, we will have versions of the Palm
Computers available and could use the utility program to copy the ROMs from a Palm
Computer to use in the training.
I'd appreciate an answer to my new question :)
Have a nice day
John Paul Fullerton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
