> Why not use the shorter Handle() or VoidHand() cast syntax?
Maybe I'm being thick skulled here.
{
VoidHand foo = ...
routine_taking_a_handle( Handle(foo) );
}
Doesn't this construct a second (temporary) pointer in the scope, assign
"foo" to it, then pass it to the routine? I don't really want to waste the
stack space for even a single pointer if I don't have to.
Am I wrong here?
-Paul, donning my flame proof undees...
--
Paul Dugas, Computer Engineer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dugas Enterprises, LLC At The Ga. DOT http://pauld.dugas.com
1711 Indian Ridge Drive tel:404-624-7840 tel:770-516-4955
Woodstock, GA 30189-6856, USA fax:404-624-7842 fax:770-516-4841
