Re: [OS 3.5] sysFtrNumProcessorID?

[Jim Schram]

At 3:12 PM -0800 1999/11/03, Scott Johnson wrote:
>How about this way: if OS 3.5, or later versions, ever gets ported to
>some hypothetical CPU that is neither an MC68328 nor an MC68EZ328, would
>the sysFtrNumProcessorID feature be extended to indicate this?

Yes, it would.

Regards,

Jim Schram
3Com/Palm Computing
Partner Engineering