According to C operator precedence, &(a->b) is equivalent to &a->b and the same goes for &(a.b) But recently, I recall fixing a bug by adding parentheses, or am I right? To be sure, how can I view the generated ASM code under CW 9.3?
Luc Le Blanc -- For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.access-company.com/developers/forums/
