DIAMOND JEFF wrote: > One point I think is worthy of emphasizing again: > > Just because a user CAN upgrade to OS 3.3 / OS 3.5 does NOT mean that they WILL >upgrade, and you do not analyze a market by looking at > potential uipgrades but at current use. This is one of the reasons why Handspring went to masked ROM. Jeff Hawkins was quoted when the Visor launched that it was discovered that only 5% of all Palm users upgrade their OS in Flash. Thus those that bitch about Handspring not having Flash is a very overvocal minority. Steve -- For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
- Re: What percent of Palms are Palm OS 3.5 or better? Aaron Ardiri
- Re: What percent of Palms are Palm OS 3.5 or better? James Preston
- Re: What percent of Palms are Palm OS 3.5 or better? Bradly J. Barton
- Re: What percent of Palms are Palm OS 3.5 or better? Aaron Ardiri
- Re: What percent of Palms are Palm OS 3.5 or better? DIAMOND JEFF
- Re: What percent of Palms are Palm OS 3.5 or better? DIAMOND JEFF
- Re: What percent of Palms are Palm OS 3.5 or better? DIAMOND JEFF
- Re: What percent of Palms are Palm OS 3.5 or better? DIAMOND JEFF
- Re: What percent of Palms are Palm OS 3.5 or better? Aaron Ardiri
- Re: What percent of Palms are Palm OS 3.5 or better? Bradly J. Barton
- RE: What percent of Palms are Palm OS 3.5 or better? Steve Sabram
- RE: What percent of Palms are Palm OS 3.5 or better? jacky Cheung
- RE: What percent of Palms are Palm OS 3.5 or better? Aaron Ardiri
- Re: What percent of Palms are Palm OS 3.5 or better? Steve Sabram
