> I checked it on my curent app. There were 2 differences: one in prc header > (seems to be a timestamp or something similar because it changes in every > compilation) and another one deep in the code: C8 -> C9. This seems to > indicate a change that might correspond to the FRAME bit.
this is exactly what i need to know :) so, seems that pilrc is doing the right thing (binary wise) - so, we can rule that one out. > I would try 5.0 SDK but I am not sure if I can trust it. I slightly remember > some warnings about it. I'll try to check it. doesn't really matter what SDK you use. > P.S. I use CW compiler. as ben pointed out, if you are using codewarrior with the pilrc plugin, it might cause some issues (mainly due to the rez format limitations). if you can verify that pilrc generates the right binary, why not just include it as a DATA resource (specify the tFRM type etc) after you create the binary using pilrc? i would not rule out the OS ignoring the frame attribute when it is a push button :) that should be pretty easy to test :) --- Aaron Ardiri [EMAIL PROTECTED] CEO - CTO +46 70 656 1143 Mobile Wizardry http://www.mobilewizardry.com/ -- For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/
