> Anymore suggestions as to what might be the problem, given that Palm
has
> apparently admitted to "underclocking" the CPU on the T3 to preserve
> battery
> life, although I could see no evidence of this in the clock control
> registers...
Are you sure you are looking in the good place? I don't know the T3
hardware implementation but I know other designs where:
-if the chip has an integrated oscillator or frequency meter, then you
look at the register on the chip and it should be its running frequency.
-if the oscillator is external
->in case it is programmable, you have to measure that guy's
frequency multiplied by the chip frequency factor.
->else you have to know its frequency and multiply it by the
chip frequency factor. But here the chip registers should always be
proportional to its running frequency
Steve
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/
