> The XML format does fit those requirements better than PilRC's RCP
> format, IMO. However, the RCP format is superior as a written language
> for developers, both due to the capabilities of the tool (header
> generation, automatic ID assignment) and because it isn't as wordy.
> However, XRD can be nice to work with, using Palm OS Resource Editor or
> using a XML-centric editor like XML Spy.
Let's not forget the developers who build applications without the
use of GUI tools, such as automatic server-side (non-GUI) generated code.
If the tool requires the use of a GUI to manage the resources, it
drops in usefulness over the prior .rcp method of resource management.
But you all know my feelings about that anyway. ;)
d.
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/
