On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 21:48:36 -0800, epross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If the goal was to eliminate inactive/bogus accounts, it could have been > done by sending an email to all of the accounts and deleting the ones > that did not respond.
And what was so bad about having "bogus" accounts? It's just an entry in a database, who cares if it's there or not? More importantly: was removing those "bogus" accounts important enough to aggravate lots of developers? Those lucky ones reading those forums at least know about the problem and can complain right now, but what about all those other developers who don't read the forums, don't know about this problem and will try to login a month from now? How are they suppose to figure out that PalmSource screwed up and disabled their account? If you ask me, PalmSource should just restore the old accounts database and stop this silliness of investigating why their logic of figuring out which account is "bogus" is so horribly broken. They'll save themselves time and fix the problem they've created. Krzysztof Kowalczyk / http://blog.kowalczyk.info -- For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/
