~+uh*>tn0(i+SB/:4bgb\^aT]CiT3G&:cEkR.yX(JX70|Jcg%24pj1K%pD-K&M=PR:&.37xOK6F
c{9>L<
References: <nr8ic8$prl$3...@blaine.gmane.org>
<1d114c88-1797-9357-1f39-1b08ab745...@vodafone.de>
<nr8mb9$r05$1...@blaine.gmane.org>
<cd0a130d-35ef-a840-f962-2ac385870...@vodafone.de>
<nr8qgq$a95$1...@blaine.gmane.org> <nr9asa$176$2...@blaine.gmane.org>
<pan$8a90a$958549b0$d90b4e87$39e8b...@cox.net>
X-No-Archive: yes
User-Agent: Pan/0.140 (Chocolate Salty Balls; GIT b8fc14e
git.gnome.org/git/pan2)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 05:16:58 +0000 Duncan wrote:
> So unless you have some sort of ssl tunneling setup, you cannot
> _possibly_ be correct with ssl working fine in your 0.14 claim, as pan
> didn't support (built-in) secure connections _at_ _all_ some 10 years
> ago or whatever with the 0.14.x version.
So the so-called SSL connection to THE NNTP server on port 563 isn't a
*secure* connection?
--
Regards,
hiker
_______________________________________________
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
