Hi Yoshi,
Maybe I was confusing! I'm not saying that the IP address/port number should
not be part of the PANA session attributes.
I'm just saying that the wording:
* IP address and UDP port number of the PaC.
Might not be correct if you are considering NAT. But it is not a strong point
for me. Just a Nice-to-Have if considered to be useful.
BR,
Lionel
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Yoshihiro Ohba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : jeudi 12 avril 2007 19:12
> À : MORAND Lionel RD-CORE-ISS
> Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: [Pana] IP address of the PaC in the PANA session attribute
>
> Hi Lionel,
>
> When NAT exists between PaC and PAA, the IP address and port
> number of the PaC will simply point to the ones used by NAT.
> If the IP address and/or port of PaC changes, the IP address
> and port number attributes will be modified to the new ones
> based on the IP address update procedure defined in Section
> 5.6. Said that I don't see a problem with containing IP
> address and port number in the PANA session attributes.
>
> Yoshihiro Ohba
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 05:55:45PM +0200, MORAND Lionel
> RD-CORE-ISS wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is a description of the PANA session attributes in
> the section 5.3:
> >
> > "PANA SA attributes as well as PANA session attributes are listed
> > below:
> >
> > PANA Session attributes:
> >
> > * Session Identifier
> >
> > * IP address and UDP port number of the PaC.
> >
> > * IP address and UDP port number of the PAA
> >
> > * Sequence number of the last transmitted request
> >
> > * Sequence number of the last received request
> >
> > * Last transmitted message payload
> >
> > * Retransmission interval
> >
> > * Session lifetime
> >
> > * PANA SA attributes "
> >
> > A NAT may exist between the PaC and the PAA (that is
> already covered
> > in section 6.1). Therefore, the PaC IP address/UDP port
> number should
> > not be part of the PANA session attributes. Instead, we should have
> > the source IP address and the UDP source port number of the last
> > PaC-initiated PANA messages (to take into account the fact that the
> > PaC may change its IP address cf. section 5.6). I don't have any
> > concrete proposal for improving the current text... But maybe it is
> > not needed if my comment is not valid at all ;)
> >
> > Lionel
> >
> > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > De : Alper Yegin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Envoy？ : jeudi 5 avril 2007 10:06
> > > ？ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Objet : [Pana] Review pana-pana-15a
> > >
> > >
> > > PANA specification is reviewed based on the last round of AD
> > > comments (thanks Yoshi!).
> > >
> > > The spec is here:
> > >
> > > http://www.panasec.org/docs/editing/draft-ietf-pana-pana-15a.txt
> > >
> > > And it's diff with the version that predates last round of AD
> > > comments
> > > (-13):
> > >
> > > http://www.panasec.org/docs/editing/draft-ietf-pana-pana-15a-f
> > > rom-3.diff.htm
> > > l
> > >
> > > Please review the document and register your feedback by
> the end of
> > > April 12, Thursday.
> > >
> > > Upon collecting and resolving any issues, the document
> will proceed
> > > to IETF last call.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Alper
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pana mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pana mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pana mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
>
_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
