basavaraj.pa...@nokia.com writes: > Hi Jari, > > > On 6/3/09 6:21 AM, "ext Jari Arkko" <jari.ar...@piuha.net> wrote: > > > > > Draft-ietf-pana-ipsec: what's up with this? If I remember correctly, > we > > talked about finding an editor and there were some volunteers. Has a > > decision been reached on who is doing the edits? Secondly, we talked > > about what needs to be done with the draft, and at least one issue > was > > identified about the selection of keys. I have not seen a conclusion > > from this thread, nor any updates to the draft. Are we ready to make > the > > conclusion, or is more discussion needed? Can people go through the > > draft identify other remaining issues? > > Regarding this I-D, I do not believe there is sufficient interest or > energy > to complete the work.
That's an interesting statement. Upon what evidence is it based: the fact that at least one person volunteered to edit the draft? Perhaps the apparently general agreement that there are no major technical issues with it & that all the changes needed are editorial (the only technical issue I could find was one w/Yoshi's key derivation draft, successfully quashed by Alper)? > Hence rather than being bogged down in the > process of > updating the I-D and progressing it, it would be best to drop this I-D > from > the WG charter and let it expire. I could have sworn that being thus "bogged down" was the major purpose of IETF WGs! > I will send another note to the ML > and > ensure there is consensus on this decision. I think you already did, or will I need to recapitulate this response? > > -Raj > > > > > Jari > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pana mailing list > > Pana@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana > > _______________________________________________ > Pana mailing list > Pana@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana _______________________________________________ Pana mailing list Pana@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
