On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 06:15:34PM +0000, Andy Balaam wrote: > Could it be implicit if you name more than one script in the comand > line? I can't think of why you'd want main.pl if you've included > several scripts.
Well, actually, there is a "ln" based feature:
% pp --output=a.out a.pl b.pl # two scripts in one!
% ln a.out b.out # symlink also works
% ./a.out # runs a.pl
% ./b.out # runs b.pl
So the output file will dynamically become the script that has
the name as the current $0. I'm open to suggestions as of
which one should be made the default.
> >Weird, this really should work. Where is the library located? Note
> >that for modules within the current directory, you have to explicitly
> >pass "pp -I ." to it. This may arguably be called a bug. Maybe.
> >
> I can't remember the details. I'll try this again and get back to you
> with a proper report when I have time.
Okay, looking forward to it.
Thanks,
/Autrijus/
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
