Cory,
Yes. ParaView's master branch works fine with STL load issue now. Thank you for 
your help!
Kai L. 


     On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 11:03 AM, Cory Quammen 
<[email protected]> wrote:
   

 Kai,
Thanks for filing these bug reports. I believe the STL load issue is already 
fixed in ParaView's master branch, but the bug fix did not make it into version 
4.4.
Best regards,Cory
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 7:13 PM, kai liu <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Scott,
I have filed both bug reports: STL file load issue and surface with edges issue 
in local rendering. 
http://www.paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=15747

http://www.paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=15748

Please let me know if I need to make changes/corrections in the bug reports.
Thank you for all your assistance.

Kai L. 


     On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 11:04 AM, Scott Wittenburg 
<[email protected]> wrote:
   

 Hello Kai,
   Now after doing a clean build of a recent ParaView master, it seems I can no 
longer see the Mitchel.stl file, and the server produces the error logs you 
have mentioned somewhere above about the being unable to read the reading 
point.  So I would say at this point, there is perhaps a bug in the stl reader. 
 I wonder if you would be willing to file a bug report?  Maybe two while you're 
at it?
1) stl file load issue, it would be great if you are able to upload a file that 
can be used to reproduce the issue, something you don't mind sharing.
2) surface with edges issue in ParaViewWeb when doing local rendering
We are still keeping track of bugs with Mantis for the time being:
http://www.paraview.org/Bug/my_view_page.php

Thanks!  Someone will get around to these when we get some time, but we 
probably can't estimate when that will be.
Cheers,Scott
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 6:43 PM, kai liu <[email protected]> wrote:


Dear Scott,
Should I just wait for the next patch release for the local rendering (WebGL) 
"Surface with edges" issue? 

I just tried the following commands to obtain the source from the GitLab and 
rebuilt the ParaViewWeb 4.4 with OSMesa, but it still does not resolve my stl 
loading issue. Am I still not getting latest 4.4 release with all the commits?.
git clone https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview.git srccd src          
git submodule update --init

On the other hand, I also tried to download and build from master .tar.gz file 
from the GitLab, but it seems not to have the latest submodule. I got the 
following error message:
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:625 (include):   include could not find load file:
     vtkModuleAPI


 CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:626 (include):   include could not find load 
file:
     vtkModuleMacros


 CMake Error at CMake/ParaViewMacros.cmake:416 (include):   include could not 
find load file:
     vtkForwardingExecutable

I am not sure how to update to the latest submodule since I did not use the git 
to clone the source.
Thank you again!
Kai L.
 


     On Friday, September 25, 2015 4:28 PM, Scott Wittenburg 
<[email protected]> wrote:
   

 

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 3:24 PM, kai liu <[email protected]> wrote:

Dear Scott:
I do not have problems setting the representation to "Surface" with color "T" 
in local deprecated rendering mode. However, I do get the same error message 
with representation set to  "Surface with edges" or "Wireframe" with color "T" 
in local deprecated rendering. 
But "Surface with edges" and "Wireframe" with color "T" in remote rendering are 
fine. 

When I click "choose palette" , select "Cool to Warm" and click apply 
properties for my cube data sample, it does not apply to the geometry. One 
thing I have noticed is that it seems to have post backs twice because the 
drop-down menu selection goes from "Cool to Warm" to "choose platter"  after I 
clicked apply properties. Could this be my sever response issue?


I think it probably is applying the color palette you choose to the geometry.  
Think of the color palette as the starting point for your coloring scheme, and 
from there you can add and remove colors from the lookup table at will.  For 
this reason, we don't keep the value you choose for color palette in the 
drop-down box, because as soon as you adjust the lookup table, that palette 
name would no longer match the lookup table you're using.  Since the default 
color palette is "Cool to Warm", you don't notice any change when you choose 
that one again.  And since your data arrays have a numeric range of 0, you 
should just see blue.  If you change the color palette to "Red to Blue 
Rainbow", in your case, you will see the data become all red, though the color 
palette drop-down will not change. 
Also there is always  latency between user inputs and visualization. What I 
meant is that when users select and apply different properties to the 
visualization, it seems to take awhile to apply those properties. For example, 
color management's representation and color selections. Could the latency be 
due to our ubuntu sever specifications?


Some latency is expected, but I guess the question is how much latency you are 
seeing when changing properties and applying them.  A second to a couple of 
seconds is normal to apply property changes, but it could vary with the data 
you are visualizing. 
Could you please provide me the latest master git HTTPS clone URL ? I can try 
and rebuild the ParaViewWeb 4.4 with OSMesa. 



We have moved to gitlab recently, and I don't think you should need an account 
or anything to access the repo there.  Try this url:
https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview.git

On the main gitlab page (https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview) you 
should find links to the new development workflow documentation which can guide 
you through the process. 
My new question is that if we would like to start ParaViewWeb with our own 
default  view. For example, set the representation always to "Surface with 
edges", Set color always to "T" , set palette always to "Cool to Warm" and etc. 
Do we simply modify the HTML markup and possibly modify/add JavaScript to those 
files in www directory? . What would be the best way to handle this situation?


That is probably not the way I would go with it, but I think this is beyond the 
scope of normal mailing list support questions.  If you are interested in 
customizing the Web Visualizer for your own needs, you could consider a support 
contract.  See here for some information:
http://www.kitware.com/products/consulting.html

Hope this helps.
Cheers,Scott 
Sorry for all the questions. Thank you very much!
Kai L 


     On Friday, September 25, 2015 1:09 PM, Scott Wittenburg 
<[email protected]> wrote:
   

 Hello Kai,
   So in doing some more testing it seems, that the problem may actually be 
with the webgl exporter when you set the representation to "Surface with 
edges".  Can you try to see if you have the problem with just "Surface"?  In 
that case, there is potentially a bug in the geometry exporter.
   Regarding the stl file issue, I did follow the same steps to build 
ParaViewWeb which you provided (just using hardware rendering rather than 
OSMesa) and I see the same issue you described.  So in this case, it seems like 
maybe some commit since the 4.4 release has fixed an issue with the stl reader. 
 If you are able to get the latest master and build it, that could fix your stl 
loading problem.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,Scott

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:45 PM, kai liu <[email protected]> wrote:

Dear Scott:
Thank you for the testings.
 1) Regarding using local rendering on the cube data file: It seems that with 
local rendering, we may not properly handle coloring by arrays where the data 
range is 0 (e.g. the range of T in your case was [303.1499938964844, 
303.1499938964844]).  I was able to use local rendering by first loading the 
data, then choosing a local rendering approach (either worked fine), and then 
going back and coloring by T.  This could be a workaround if you need to test 
the speed of local rendering vs remote.

Kai's Response:
My local deprecated (WebGL) rendering seems quite fast now when I load ParaView 
Datasets. 
I was not able to use local rendering (Local VGL or Local Deprecated) on my 
cube data file. I first loaded the data, chose local (Deprecated) option and 
then went back to color by T. I got the same error message: WebSocket 
connection to 
'ws://XXXX:8080/proxy?sessionId=7bb6e67a-63a9-11e5-9b44-00155dd73e0d' failed: 
Error during WebSocket handshake: Unexpected response code: 503 . I believe the 
server side process indeed crashed. However, remote rendering does seem to work 
fine with T color. The speed of local rendering is very slow, but the speed of 
local deprecated (WebGL) rendering is very fast now. 


2) Regarding loading the .stl file, I did not run into the same issue as you 
did, i.e. the .stl file loaded without any problems.  The paraviewweb I am 
running was built from master which is a day or so old, so I'm wondering what 
version you may have compiled?
Kai's Response:

I tried .stl file a couple of times again and still the same. I do not see the 
geometry in ParaViewWeb, and the log file has the same error message as before. 
Currently my Ubuntu 14.04 has ParaViewWeb - 4.4 version. I built this on 
09/22/2015. The following is the commands I used to obtain the source:
Get ParaViewWeb by a Specific Version
git clone git://paraview.org/ParaView.git srccd srcgit checkout v4.4.0git 
submodule update --init

When I build ParaViewWeb 4.3 in July, 2015, I used the following commands:

Get the latest ParaViewWeb source 
git clone git://paraview.org/stage/ParaView.git srccd src          git 
submodule update --init


I have put my responses inline below again ....




On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:15 AM, kai liu <[email protected]> wrote:

Dear Scott,
Thanks for your quick response, I have also put my responses inline below with 
light blue color :





Issue 1: Loading ASCII stl file
When I try to load my ASCII stl file on the ParaviewWeb, I receive the 
following error message in my log file. However, desktop ParaView application 
loads the file fine. 
ERROR: In /home/user/ParaViewWeb/ParaView/src/VTK/IO/Geometry/vtkSTLReader.cxx, 
line 461vtkSTLReader (0x5d89b50): STLReader: error while reading file 
/home/user/ParaViewWeb/data/Mitchell_Lee_Administration_ReckordArmory_.stl at 
line 14: unable to read reading point.
ERROR: In 
/home/user/ParaViewWeb/ParaView/src/VTK/Common/ExecutionModel/vtkExecutive.cxx, 
line 784vtkPVCompositeDataPipeline (0x5d84f70): Algorithm 
vtkFileSeriesReader(0x5d881b0) returned failure for request: vtkInformation 
(0x5d97f30)  Debug: Off  Modified Time: 225417  Reference Count: 1  Registered 
Events: (none)  Request: REQUEST_DATA  FROM_OUTPUT_PORT: 0  
ALGORITHM_AFTER_FORWARD: 1  FORWARD_DIRECTION: 0


Did you build the ParaView desktop application in the same build as the version 
you're using to run ParaViewWeb?  Maybe you could try to take one of the 
standard ParaView datasets and try to load it in ParaViewWeb, and see if you 
have the same issue you mentioned above.  To get this data if you don't already 
have it, go here:
http://www.paraview.org/download/

And under "Type of Download", choose "Data, Documentation, and Tutorials".  
Once you get this data, try opening the "disk_out_ref.ex2" file in ParaViewWeb. 
 If you see the same issue as above, then there could be something going on 
with the way you have built ParaView, which we can try to figure out at that 
point.  If you do not see the same issue as above, then perhaps you could send 
me (off the list) a sample data file I could use to try to replicate the 
problem and debug it on this end.

Kai's Response 
I did not build the ParaView desktop application. I installed ParaView 4.1.0 
through the Ubuntu terminal using  sudo apt-get install paraviewopenfoam410 . 
I tested files with local ParaView desktop application as well as local 
ParaViewWeb. My Ubuntu 14.04 server does not have ParaView application, and it 
has only ParaViewWeb. Both server and local ParaViewWeb produce the same 
issues. 
I have tested "disk_out_ref.ex2" file in ParaViewWeb, and it seems to be okay. 
I will send you the sample data files privately. 

Just so I am clear.  Your "local" version is the one you install via apt-get?  
And the Ubuntu 14.04 server version is the one you built yourself?  Did you 
download a source bundle to build the server one?  If so, do you know what 
version you downloaded and built on your server?
Kai's Response:

I apologize for the confusion. I built both my "local" and "sever" ParaViewWeb 
4.4.0 with OSMesa using the following commands:
git clone git://paraview.org/ParaView.git srccd srcgit checkout v4.4.0git 
submodule update --init
I had to use git checkout v4.4.0 because last time the repository head was 4.3 
version. 
My "local" ParaView 4.1 desktop application was installed via apt-get. When I 
said ParaView desktop application, I am not referring to the ParaViewWeb at 
all. I always refer ParaView and ParaViewWeb as two applications. 
Please note that I had also tried ParaViewWeb 4.1 and 4.3 on both my "local" 
and "server", they both had the same issues in loading the ASCII STL file and 
rendering the output fields, which would be the same issues currently I am 
experiencing in ParaViewWeb 4.4.
 


Issue 2: 
If I do the following selections on the ParaViewWeb, I always receive 
src/VTK/Common/Core/vtkDataArrayTemplate.h:191: T 
vtkDataArrayTemplate<T>::GetValue(vtkIdType) [with T = float; vtkIdType = long 
long int]: Assertion `id >= 0 && id < this->Size' failed message in the log 
file and cause the web socket connection closed.  





2015-09-23 17:33:52-0400 [-] Log opened.2015-09-23 17:33:53-0400 [-] Site 
starting on 90092015-09-23 17:33:53-0400 [-] Starting factory 
<twisted.web.server.Site instance at 0x7fb6f2e55830>2015-09-23 17:33:53-0400 
[HTTPChannel,0,127.0.0.1] Client has reconnected, cancelling reaper2015-09-23 
17:33:53-0400 [HTTPChannel,0,127.0.0.1] on_connect: connection count = 
1pvpython: 
/home/user/ParaViewWeb/ParaView/src/VTK/Common/Core/vtkDataArrayTemplate.h:191: 
T vtkDataArrayTemplate<T>::GetValue(vtkIdType) [with T = float; vtkIdType = 
long long int]: Assertion `id >= 0 && id < this->Size' failed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WebSocket connection to 
'ws://XXXXXXXXXXX:8080/proxy?sessionId=0c562ad6-623f-11e5-9b44-00155dd73e0d' 
failed: Error during WebSocket handshake: Unexpected response code: 503


I checked HTTP traffic, it has the following message. I assume the connection 
is closed because of the above error. 



I wonder if the server side process crashed as a result of the error you see in 
the log file?  That would explain the websocket connection error.  Again, 
trying a known data set like "disk_out_ref.ex2" may help us to pinpoint problem 
which caused the error output you saw above.

Kai's Response 
My unintelligent question is how could I determine if the server side process 
crashed? 



One approach: Use a terminal on the machine where ParaViewWeb is running and 
type:

ps -ef | grep pvpython
If the process is running, you should see a pvpython instance running, where 
your pv_web_visualizer.py script is the argument, along with any other 
arguments your launcher provided when it started the process for you.  
Something like:
/path/to/paraview/build/bin/pvpython 
/path/to/paraview/build/lib/site-packages/paraview/web/pv_web_visualizer.py 
--port 9999 --data-dir /blah/blah/blah
In the case of the cube you shared with me, the process did indeed crash as a 
result of the steps you provided.
Kai's Response:

Thank you for the command and the explanations.


 


 
Issue 3: Slow ParaViewWeb
My ParaViewWeb is very slow. Even I change the rendering mode to WebGL, It is 
still very slow. The Ubuntu 14.04 Sever  specifications are the following:
- 8 Cores - 8 GB RAM  - 2.3 Ghz processors



To get faster rendering with OSMesa, you may try building a recent version of 
OSMesa using Gallium + LLVMPipe.  See here:
http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView/ParaView_And_Mesa_3D

But even that won't be as fast as hardware rendering (not using OSMesa).  I'm 
not sure why you don't see a speedup when switching to WebGL, though, for if 
your data is small enough to all fit in within the GPU of your desktop or 
laptop, then it should be faster than offscreen rendering on the server, once 
the data is loaded.
Kai's Response 

I believe my build is based on  recent version of OSMesa using Gallium + 
LLVMPipe
Mesa 9.2.2 OSMesa Gallium llvmpipe

make -j4
autoreconf -fi
./configure \CXXFLAGS="-O2 -g -DDEFAULT_SOFTWARE_DEPTH_BITS=31" \CFLAGS="-O2 -g 
-DDEFAULT_SOFTWARE_DEPTH_BITS=31" \--disable-xvmc \--disable-glx \--disable-dri 
\--with-dri-drivers="" \--with-gallium-drivers="swrast" \--enable-texture-float 
\--disable-shared-glapi \--disable-egl \--with-egl-platforms="" 
\--enable-gallium-osmesa \--enable-gallium-llvm=yes \--with-llvm-shared-libs 
\--prefix=/opt/mesa/9.2.2/llvmpipe

make -j2
make -j4 install


This looks fine to me, though I believe OSMesa Gallium llvmpipe has moved along 
quite a few versions since that documentation was written, so building a more 
recent one could be something to try. 

When I built ParaViewWeb, The following is what I changed when I generated the 
cmake file:
PARAVIEW_ENABLE_PYTHON      ONPARAVIEW_BUILD_QT_GUI       
OFFCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX        /.../ParaView/installVTK_USE_X                   
OFFOPENGL_INCLUDE_DIR          
/opt/mesa/9.2.2/llvmpipe/includeOPENGL_gl_LIBRARYOPENGL_glu_LIBRARY          
/opt/mesa/9.2.2/llvmpipe/lib/libGLU.so
...

[Message clipped]  



   



   



   



-- 
Cory Quammen
R&D Engineer
Kitware, Inc.

  
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Reply via email to