David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My personal suggestion is that we should be looking for a solution
> outside of any company or distribution to centralize all of the things
> we need:
> - source repo in git
> - mailing lists
> - web site
> - download location
> Tarballs and the web site are provided at gnu.org. This is fine, but
> they don't provide things beyond that.
>
> I would like our resources to not be tied to any one distribution or
> company so as to avoid any wrong ideas that people might get.
I agree with you.
> But all of these things should be a lower priority than working on
> parted 2.0, unless you are dedicated infrastructure people. Speaking
> of, we don't really have a description of who does what on the parted
> project. How about we take some time to work up a diagram of our
> current structure and then figure out what people we need and what
> kind of work needs to be done?
I agree with you here too.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
_______________________________________________
parted-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
