On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Ethan Blanton <[email protected]> wrote: > ... with WM_CLIENT_MACHINE passed through transparently. This seems > the most appropriate course of action. I'm not even convinced the > (via xpra) should be there.
The one downside to that is that WM_CLIENT_MACHINE may be used for other purposes as well, e.g.: http://standards.freedesktop.org/wm-spec/wm-spec-1.3.html#KILLINGWINDOWS -- Nathaniel _______________________________________________ Parti-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.partiwm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parti-discuss
