Ethan Blanton spake unto us the following wisdom: > Nathaniel Smith spake unto us the following wisdom: > > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Ethan Blanton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ... with WM_CLIENT_MACHINE passed through transparently. This seems > > > the most appropriate course of action. I'm not even convinced the > > > (via xpra) should be there. > > > > The one downside to that is that WM_CLIENT_MACHINE may be used for > > other purposes as well, e.g.: > > http://standards.freedesktop.org/wm-spec/wm-spec-1.3.html#KILLINGWINDOWS > > I don't see the problem, what am I missing? > > Maybe we're talking about two different things ... I mean, if I run > emacs on foo against an xpra server on bar, and then connect an xpra > client on baz, the emacs window's WM_CLIENT_MACHINE should say 'colt'. > This should make everything Just Work, right?
Wow, *that* was incoherent. WM_CLIENT_MACHINE should say 'foo'. Colt
is my workstation, and figures nowhere in this example. ;-)
Ethan
--
The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws [that have no remedy
for evils]. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor
determined to commit crimes.
-- Cesare Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishments", 1764
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Parti-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.partiwm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parti-discuss
