Nathaniel Smith spake unto us the following wisdom:
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Ethan Blanton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > ... with WM_CLIENT_MACHINE passed through transparently.  This seems
> > the most appropriate course of action.  I'm not even convinced the
> > (via xpra) should be there.
> 
> The one downside to that is that WM_CLIENT_MACHINE may be used for
> other purposes as well, e.g.:
>   http://standards.freedesktop.org/wm-spec/wm-spec-1.3.html#KILLINGWINDOWS

I don't see the problem, what am I missing?

Maybe we're talking about two different things ... I mean, if I run
emacs on foo against an xpra server on bar, and then connect an xpra
client on baz, the emacs window's WM_CLIENT_MACHINE should say 'colt'.
This should make everything Just Work, right?

Ethan

-- 
The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws [that have no remedy
for evils].  They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor
determined to commit crimes.
                -- Cesare Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishments", 1764

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Parti-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.partiwm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parti-discuss

Reply via email to