Just for the record:
I vote for github.

You simply missed all opportunities to make me involved in issues, pull requests and discussions. Not having password-store on github has raise the hurdle that high, that i never contributed / participated for the last years.

If you think github will eventually close someday in the future then, why not deal with that when that point in time is here. Solving a not yet existing issue is like not following the YAGNI principle. Git is decentralized so you always have a backup - and backuping issues/discussions should not be a problem.

After having enough pain with one issue i joined the mailing list.
But having this mailing list now for some month makes me so frustrated and feels so as being in the 80's that i now leave this f**ing mailing list.

You lost me. I will rejoin when you are on github. Please reconsider the user experience of your community. I guess some of them got used to it, but i doubed that they are happy.

Best regards
Christian

On 30.03.20 10:43, J Rt wrote:
Dear all,

I am curious about why a self-hosting rather than github hosting
solution was chosen for this project. Is it offering better safety /
is this legacy / is it a way to keep too poor devs away? ^^ .

Cheers,

JR

Reply via email to