> However, this comment got to the core of one of the challenges. Not > having a bug tracker, PR list, issue tracker, whatever leads to patches > languishing on the list and being either re-bumped or lost. Right now > the pace of the project is not allowing code to get committed. I don't > need another active project to track, but knowing that a periodic > check-in by the maintainers would be easy enough for them to cruise > through a list of pending work, might allow that happen more frequently.
Maybe something like sourcehut (https://sourcehut.org) could help with the workflow.
