Hi Jeremy, On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 02:12:09PM +0000, Simon Guinot wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 03:20:10PM +0200, Jeremy Kerr wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > > > Recently, I have posted a patch series on the U-Boot mailing-list. > > > Here is the patchwork entry for the patch number 6 (the last for this > > > series): http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/93555/ > > > > > > Until now, this patch has been iterated seven times and none of this > > > patch versions seems to have a patchwork entry. > > > > Just to make sure I understand you correctly - you mean that you've sent > > this patch seven times, but you only see one entry in the uboot > > patchwork? > > It is exactly what I mean. > > > > > If that's the case, could you forward me (off-list) one of the mails > > that did not appear in patchwork? If possible, send the raw message > > itself, with full headers. > > Ok I will forward to you the v7 patch. If needed, all this patches > are available in the U-Boot ML archives. The subject is: > "[PATCH x/x] Add support for Network Space v2"
Did you learn something from my patch email ? Any clue about this weird behaviour ? As an additional information, I have noticed that with patch v2 some non ASCII characters have been added to the diff. As a result, the email charset switched from ASCII to UTF-8. Moreover, I have noticed that the following lines are appended to the email header by the U-Boot ML: --===============0445947462== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Maybe it is enough to confuse patchwork email processing ? Regards, Simon
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
