Le 15/06/2011 10:48, Simon Guinot a écrit :
Hi Jeremy,

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:44:56AM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
Hi Simon,

Did you learn something from my patch email ? Any clue about this weird
behaviour ?
Yes - sorry about the delay though.
No problems.

It looks like the mail can't be decoded correctly. The content type of
the patch part is:

         Content-Type: text/plain
         Content-Disposition: inline; filename=mutt-kw-1000-6693-519
         Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Since there is no encoding specified, patchwork assumes UTF-8.

However, you have the following text in the patch:

          Marius Gr=F6ger<[email protected]>

\xf6 is not a valid UTF-8 sequence, so patchwork can't reliably
represent the patch data. At the moment, that means that the parse
fails.

So - how was this mail generated?
The email was generated using git-format-patch and sent using
git-send-email. I think the patch is correct.

Actually, \xf6 is the iso-8859-{1,2,3,4} representation for 'ö' and
it is the way this character is encoded within the original source file.
Probably it should be fixed.

Thanks for your help :)

Simon
We should involve Wolfgang here, because ISTR there were already discussions about encodings in U-Boot, with the conclusion at the time that ISO-8859 was to be used:

<http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/84647>

Maybe finally we should move to UTF-8?

Amicalement,
--
Albert.

_______________________________________________
Patchwork mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork

Reply via email to