The AD sent this mail to the list: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/paws/current/msg00926.html on April 17th Since nobody argued convincingly (or otherwise) that the current usage has to be reported instead of the anticipated usage, I assumed the AD went ahead and presented the charter update proposal with the 'anticipated usage' to the iesg. Pete, could you confirm if this has happened or will happen in the near future?
- Gabor From: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [paws] Charter update progress Gabor There has been no reflector discussion since 24th April UK time. Can we now submit the charter proposal to the IESG, or has that already happened? Thanks Andy
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
