I was actually waiting on you to make the final call, but I will take
this as it and put it on the agenda for the Thursday IESG meeting.
pr
On 5/3/12 3:39 PM, [email protected] wrote:
The AD sent this mail to the list:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/paws/current/msg00926.html on
April 17th
Since nobody argued convincingly (or otherwise) that the current usage
has to be reported instead of the anticipated usage, I assumed the AD
went ahead and presented the charter update proposal with the
'anticipated usage' to the iesg.
Pete, could you confirm if this has happened or will happen in the
near future?
- Gabor
*From: *"[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*To: *"[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
*Subject: *[paws] Charter update progress
Gabor
There has been no reflector discussion since 24^th April UK time. Can
we now submit the charter proposal to the IESG, or has that already
happened?
Thanks
Andy
_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102
_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
