Before Gabor threatens to shoot me let me repeat our position on this charter update. Spectrum Bridge is very much in favor of feedback loops. If I was my decision to make I would go for devices reporting expected channel use in response to a channel list. If the group prefers a "channels used" report in the next channel request we would support that. We would even support both, assuming they were equal (both mandatory or both optional). What we are trying to avoid at this time is a real time recurring "channel in use" update. This is a huge burden. We may end up there in the future, but if we do I want to be very certain that we know why and what that means. Peter S.
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
