The question makes sense. Answer, quite high for a nearly lossless signal. I
doubt that the decoding process is perfect, otherwise, why decode, but I
think the near equivalent of lossless would be 768kb.
Jay


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dana S. Leslie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC-Audio" <[email protected]>; "BlindTech"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2005 6:01 PM
Subject: a Question about band Width/kbps


> I'm not entirely sure I understand this subject well enough. so, I'm not
> sure if I'm phrasing this question correctly, or if it even  makes sense.
> But, here goes, anyway:
>
> I think I understand that the wider the band width of an audio stream, the
> more kbps, the more information one receives each second, and hence the
> better the quality of the sound is/can be. That's why 128kbps streams
sound
> better than 20kbps streams, etc., especially for music and other high
> information content. But, as a benchmark for comparison, what would be the
> band width of a high-fidelity, stereo, on-air broadcast, or of a live
> concert performance? (Does that last even make sense?)
>
> Thanks.
>
> Blessed Be,
>
> Dana
>
> D. S. Leslie, née C. R. Guttman
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Skype: dsleslie
> Web: ÞE OL' PHILOSOPHIE SHOPPE
> Your Source for Discounted Ideas
> http://members.cox.net/dsleslie2/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
> http://www.pc-audio.org
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



_______________________________________________
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to