I have used MX Skype Recorder, but had some difficulty to start and stop recording unless I set it up to do it automatically. I have used Virtual Audio Cable and it works fine, although as already stated, it is complicated. I have also used Total Recorder and it has no problem with my system, although to record from Skype I must set the device to Logitech headset, it is not enough to simply follow instructions.
I think I wil try Virtual Audio Streaming too, for if it is simple to use it may be a good alternative to Total Recorder, especially if I use Total Recorder streaming capabilities to send my signal to a remote streaming server and want to record the output with something other than Tapin Radio. Regards, Humberto -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of chris hallsworth Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 2:57 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Virtual Audio Streaming It's simpler. Not sure about better yet. I never got the hang of Virtual Audio Cable. Christopher Hallsworth On 13/04/2012 17:47, Rishi D Mack wrote: > Is this better than virtual audio cable? Or V A C is better? > > -----Original Message----- > From: chris hallsworth [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 11:42 AM > To: PC Audio Discussion List > Subject: Virtual Audio Streaming > > I found an interesting program/driver combination over on another list. > It is basically a virtual audio card. It allows you to basically do what > Stereo Mix could offer in XP, but perhaps more. This is especially > useful for Vista and later users, or XP users whose sound card does not > support Stereo Mix. Free trial with "trial" noise, whatever that is, > added as part of the evaluation's limitations, available at > www.virtualaudiostreaming.net. The program is called Virtual Audio > Streaming. To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [email protected]
