Hi,

On Jul 25, 2011, at 11:16 AM, [email protected] wrote:

> 
> Hi JP, 
> 
> IMO, we don't need two methods. The method of extending IGP may impact on 
> large aspect. 
> Extending BRPC and PCEP defined in this draft is enough. 
> 

So let the WG decide which one of the methods is most appropriate

Thanks.

JP.

> Thanks, 
> 
> Xihua 
> 
> 
> JP Vasseur <[email protected]> 
> 发件人:  [email protected]
> 2011-07-25 下午 08:30
> 
> 收件人
> 王磊 <[email protected]>
> 抄送
> [email protected]
> 主题
> Re: [Pce] request timeslot for draft-wang-pce-inter-as-extentions-01
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks for your feed-back. It would be interesting to hear from the WG if 
> indeed 
> we need two methods. To each specific problem we can certainly find a number 
> of way to solve it, but let's try to make sure that we do not specify a new 
> technique 
> if we can use what exist today. 
> 
> WG ? 
> 
> Thanks. 
> 
> JP. 
> On Jul 25, 2011, at 12:25 AM, 王磊 wrote: 
> Hi, Xuerong and PCEers
> 
> I have read the draft. It provides an alternate method that extends
> BRPC and PCEP protocol to get TE information of Inter-AS biderectional
> links. In my opinion, It is useful for the smooth upgrade of existing
> MPLS/GMPLS networks to support Inter-AS bidirectional path
> computation, because it need not any extension or modification to the
> IGP (such as OSPF and IS-IS) used in MPLS/GMPLS-enabled
> routers/switches. However, the method of IGP extension is also
> applicable and suitable for new network-equipments. So, I think there
> is no conflict between these two metods. The draft could be used in
> the scenario where the IGP extension of Inter-AS biderectional links
> can not be supported.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Lei Wang
> Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
> [email protected] or [email protected]
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to