That was my question too On Jul 26, 2011, at 1:55 PM, Fatai Zhang wrote:
> Hi all, > > RFC5392 is a kind of mechamism and it is already there. > > Why we need to define another solution based on some nonexistent assumption? > > > > > > > > Fatai > > Thanks > ----- Original Message ----- > From: JP Vasseur > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; 王磊 > Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 1:20 AM > Subject: Re: [Pce] request timeslot for draft-wang-pce-inter-as-extentions-01 > > Hi, > > On Jul 25, 2011, at 11:16 AM, [email protected] wrote: > >> >> Hi JP, >> >> IMO, we don't need two methods. The method of extending IGP may impact on >> large aspect. >> Extending BRPC and PCEP defined in this draft is enough. >> > > So let the WG decide which one of the methods is most appropriate > > Thanks. > > JP. > >> Thanks, >> >> Xihua >> >> >> JP Vasseur <[email protected]> >> 发件人: [email protected] >> 2011-07-25 下午 08:30 >> >> 收件人 >> 王磊 <[email protected]> >> 抄送 >> [email protected] >> 主题 >> Re: [Pce] request timeslot for draft-wang-pce-inter-as-extentions-01 >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for your feed-back. It would be interesting to hear from the WG if >> indeed >> we need two methods. To each specific problem we can certainly find a number >> of way to solve it, but let's try to make sure that we do not specify a new >> technique >> if we can use what exist today. >> >> WG ? >> >> Thanks. >> >> JP. >> On Jul 25, 2011, at 12:25 AM, 王磊 wrote: >> Hi, Xuerong and PCEers >> >> I have read the draft. It provides an alternate method that extends >> BRPC and PCEP protocol to get TE information of Inter-AS biderectional >> links. In my opinion, It is useful for the smooth upgrade of existing >> MPLS/GMPLS networks to support Inter-AS bidirectional path >> computation, because it need not any extension or modification to the >> IGP (such as OSPF and IS-IS) used in MPLS/GMPLS-enabled >> routers/switches. However, the method of IGP extension is also >> applicable and suitable for new network-equipments. So, I think there >> is no conflict between these two metods. The draft could be used in >> the scenario where the IGP extension of Inter-AS biderectional links >> can not be supported. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Lei Wang >> Tsinghua University, Beijing, China >> [email protected] or [email protected] >> _______________________________________________ >> Pce mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pce mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
