+1 support
BTW, I remember that there is another draft addressing the requirements froming GMPLS, draft-tang-pce-stateful-pce-02.txt, maybe the usecases can be combined together. Furthermore, do we need to recharter the scope of PCE WG to reflect the related work? Best regards Fei JP Vasseur <[email protected]> 发件人: [email protected] 2012-02-02 16:14 收件人 [email protected] 抄送 主题 [Pce] Adopting draft-crabbe-pce-stateful-pce-02 as a PCE WG document Dear all, This document has been presented twice and certainly still deserves more discussion, but it seems that there is enough interest to poll the Working Group for WG adoption. Please let us know by Feb 19th noon ET, whether you are in favor/opposed of adopting draft-crabbe-pce-stateful-pce as a WG document. JP and Julien. JP. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
