Oscar (and others),
Your point is not clear to me. On the one hand, I understand you support
having some work on stateful PCE, hence adding it to our charter. On the
other hand, the current question is *not* on a charter update, but on
adopting a particular I-D as a PCE WG document.
Therefore, could elaborate on where you are standing? "Interesting
solution, suited for some specific cases" or "by no means the basis of
the stateful PCE"?
Moreover, be aware that tackling stateful PCE does not imply addressing
the full stateful PCE problem space. Note that the proposed draft comes
with a contained scope. Trying to widen our charter too much (e.g. Ramon
mentioning "no signaling") is likely to face strong reluctance from the
IESG.
Cheers,
Julien
Le 08/02/2012 11:47, Oscar González de Dios a écrit :
Hi all PCErs,
I also support the work in draft-crabbe-pce-stateful-pce-02 and share
the main concerns. Although I do support the work, I think we should start
scoping the stateful PCE, looking at the architecture, application scenarios
and use cases from a broad perspective, with many inputs from service
providers, vendors and data center users (which are having more and more
network needs). This draft is a very particular interesting solution, suited
for some specific cases, but by no means the basis of the stateful PCE.
Furthermore, it looks weird to have a WG stateful PCE document without being
the stateful PCE in the charter.
Thus, if everybody thinks that PCE is mature enough to start entering
into more complex stuff, let's start building the basis of the stateful PCE.
And then, have solutions for the different environments/use cases.
Óscar
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar
nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace
situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and
receive email on the basis of the terms set out at
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
