Stating the obvious... support! Regards, Dhruv (Author)
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 5:13 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear PCE WG, > > Following our previous discussions on IRO within PCEP, do you agree with the > adoption of draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 as a PCE WG I-D? Please share your > comments using the mailing list, justifying as much as possible in case you > are opposed. > > Thanks, > > JP & Julien > > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu > ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and > delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
