El 12/01/2015 a las 12:43, [email protected] escribió:
Dear PCE WG,
Following our previous discussions on IRO within PCEP, do you agree
with the adoption of draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 as a PCE WG I-D?
Please share your comments using the mailing list, justifying as much
as possible in case you are opposed.
All,
Imho it can be adopted. It clarifies RFC5440 to state that IRO is
ordered and the role of L bit. Being involved in the domain sequence
draft that triggered this, and contributed to the survey, I am ok with
the outcome. That said, and for completeness, I remember someone
(Adrian?) mentioned in the past that not assuming ordering in IRO could
mean more flexibility to the PCE. Maybe this can be addressed in the future?
thanks
Ramon
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
