Support as co-author Cheers, Jeff On 8/12/16, 02:43, "Pce on behalf of Julien Meuric" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
Hi all, During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear consensus in the room on the interest for the aforementioned I-D. We now need to see if the mailing list confirms this consensus. As a result, do you think that draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 is a right foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, comments are very welcome, especially if you do not support the adoption. Thanks, JP, Jon & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
