Yes, Support adoption of this draft as a WG document. Thanks, Rakesh
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Julien Meuric <[email protected]> Date: Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 3:13 PM Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Hi all, During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear consensus in the room on the interest for the aforementioned I-D. We now need to see if the mailing list confirms this consensus. As a result, do you think that draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 is a right foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, comments are very welcome, especially if you do not support the adoption. Thanks, JP, Jon & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
