Support. -Pavan
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 5:43 AM, Julien Meuric <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear > consensus in the room on the interest for the aforementioned I-D. We now > need to see if the mailing list confirms this consensus. As a result, do > you think that draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 is a right foundation for a PCE > WG document? As usual, comments are very welcome, especially if you do not > support the adoption. > > Thanks, > > JP, Jon & Julien > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
