Hi Everyone,

    I read through the document and support its WGLC.
    The document specifies the PCEP extensions to set up TE paths in native IP 
networks and to provide information/parameters for creating BGP sessions and 
advertising prefixes. It is useful and ready.

Best Regards,
Huaimo
________________________________
From: Pce <pce-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2023 6:15 PM
To: pce@ietf.org <pce@ietf.org>
Cc: pce-chairs <pce-cha...@ietf.org>; 
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org 
<draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org>
Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

Hi WG,

This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call for 
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20 [1].

Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to 
the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you 
support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is 
ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are 
most welcome.

The WG LC will end on Wednesday 31st May 2023. We will also notify the IDR WG 
about this WGLC.

A general reminder to the WG to be more vocal during the last-call/adoption and 
help us unclog our queues :)

Thanks,
Dhruv & Julien

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip/
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to