Kyle wrote:

 There is very little difference between 9.1 and 9.2.x.
>People think that the RAM requirements are more hefty, but that is not
>true.  I
>would go with 9.2.1 since 9.2.2 is just a finder integration bump for OS X
>above
>9.2.1.  I have NEVER had any problems with 9.2 over 9.1, and I have
>installed it
>on hundreds of machines.

Thanks for easing my worried mind.

I just finished up a Clean Install and I'll leave it at OS 9 for now -
while I pick away at the previous System Folder elements.

Nary an operational hitch.

Cheers,
Terry



-- 
PCI-PowerMacs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com  | Refurbished Drives |
 -- Sonnet & PowerLogix Upgrades - start at $169   |  & CDRWs on Sale!  |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

PCI-PowerMacs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/pci-powermacs.shtml>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive:<http://www.mail-archive.com/pci-powermacs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to