Terry Graham wrote:
> Kyle wrote:
>
> There is very little difference between 9.1 and 9.2.x.
> >People think that the RAM requirements are more hefty, but that is not
> >true. I
> >would go with 9.2.1 since 9.2.2 is just a finder integration bump for OS X
> >above
> >9.2.1. I have NEVER had any problems with 9.2 over 9.1, and I have
> >installed it
> >on hundreds of machines.
>
> Thanks for easing my worried mind.
>
> I just finished up a Clean Install and I'll leave it at OS 9 for now -
> while I pick away at the previous System Folder elements.
Do not leave it at 9 or 9.0.4. update it to 9.1 immediately. 9 and 9.0.4 are
bad OS's.
--
==============================================================
Kyle H. Hansen
Apple Certified Technician
Apple Solution Expert
Macintosh Server Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==============================================================
--
PCI-PowerMacs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...
Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives |
-- Sonnet & PowerLogix Upgrades - start at $169 | & CDRWs on Sale! |
Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>
PCI-PowerMacs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/pci-powermacs.shtml>
--> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive:<http://www.mail-archive.com/pci-powermacs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>
Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
