That's an interesting site. I tried to search for "CA Vet" AV software since it was #1 at that site, and couldn't find it anywhere, but I did find other sites with similar tests, and unfortunately, all had different results! One had Kaspersky Lab not rating very good at all, and another had it at the top. Another had CD Vet at the top, and still another site had it at the bottom. The only consistency I found among all the test sites was what I have said for years; McAfee, Panda and Trend Micro is the worse. They were consistently at the bottom or very near to it. That link shows Norton to be in 2nd place, according to the latest part of the graph at the extreme right (you can see it didn't miss any from Nov. 99 to date, where nod32 failed once). -Clint
God Bless Us All Clint Hamilton, Owner http://OrpheusComputing.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karl Springer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Clint Hamilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:03 AM Subject: (Fwd) Re: PCWorks: Revised Antiv*ral program Query When trimming your message I inadvertently left out the author of the material I quoted; I was keying off the single > prefix thinking it was you who wrote that part. Please accept my apology. As you requested I'm including the original correspondence. I've done so as a forward. Karl ------- Forwarded message follows ------- From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Clint Hamilton" I did NOT type that. -Clint ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karl Springer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 7 Nov 2001 5:58 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Clint Hamilton wrote, at least in part: > ... It seems that some program by Kaspersky called Antiv*ral > Toolkit Pro beats Norton or Mcaffee hands down by all who use > it. Repeated theme by those reviewers indicate v*ruses > consistently picked up that both Norton and Mcaffee missed... > Any new thoughts on this?? <http://www.v*rusbtn.com/100/vb100sum.html> (change the * to an i) presents a summary of how the various AV products have faired against 'In the Wild' test-sets since January 1998. Karl ============= PCWorks Mailing List ================= Don't see your post? Check our posting guidelines & make sure you've followed proper posting procedures, http://pcworkers.com/rules.htm Contact list owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unsubscribing and other changes: http://pcworkers.com =====================================================
