Peter,

The 512 Meg limit setting is one that I was sure you would have known
about - I found out quite some time ago that if you click on the
advanced tab from the general page of Msconfig, one of the items lets
you limit how much memory you want Win98 to end up using. When I just
went, the greyed out amount was showing 511 Megs. So this was something
I was not worried about. Also, there are a number of items on the MS
tech page deals with memory, not only with 98 but also issues with 2K, I
found out - 2K can only handle 4 Gigs of ram, so that has proven a MAJOR
problem for some people who did not know that 2K had, likewise, an upper
limit on memory it could handle.

However, since I really only need one OS active at a time, the triple
boot would be fine - I still intend to look at Connectix's product since
it sounds like a great product to use, no matter what.

Since you did not make any comments about the installs and each in its
separate partition, I guess I can assume that it will give me ultimately
a triple boot doing things that way.

Thanks,

Ralph


Peter Kaulback wrote:
> 
> Ralph,
> 
> Of the two I have found Connectix Virtual PC to be smoother plus it has the
> damned MS logo certification :/
> 
> If you will have 1 gig of memory then you can forget about a triple boot
> with 98 as any more memory than 512 mb will cause 98 to fail.
> 
> However if you use Virtual PC then you can control how much memory each OS
> can use. For example you can give 98 64 mb, win2k 128 mb and XP 256 mb,
> plus you can control their hard drive sizes too. With memory controlling
> you can then smoothly boot into all your OS's concurrently.
> 
> Unless you can figure out how to force 98 to see only 512 then you will be
> set for the triple boot :(
> 
> Peter Kaulback
============= PCWorks Mailing List =================
Don't see your post? Check our posting guidelines &
make sure you've followed proper posting procedures,
http://pcworkers.com/rules.htm
Contact list owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribing and other changes: http://pcworkers.com
=====================================================

Reply via email to