Hi all,
Sorry if I'm just increasing noise to signal ratio, but how will
authors who at the moment use frameworks such as Flext, which use the
inherited pd FFT (at this point) use fftw if you separate it in the
ways you're talking about? I may be missing the point of course.
d
On 27 Sep 2006, at 17:29, Miller Puckette wrote:
It's probably all the same if there's one objectmaker that changes its
behavior or if there are several (just an inplementation question).
Perhaps the new "declare" object (designed to be visible :) could get
new flags to manipulate the way object names are mapped to creators.
Just an idea...
cheers
Miller
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 01:52:52AM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Miller Puckette wrote:
Yes indeed. I'm thinking of automatically having new classes
shadow old
ones,
so that anything in Pd could simpy be "externed" over. Not sure
of all the
long-term ramifications, but I like the idea.
How about having several objectmakers with different methods
defined in
them?
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - t?l:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
| Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montr?al QC Canada
_______________________________________________
PD-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
_______________________________________________
PD-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
--
David Plans Casal
main at davidcasal dot com
http://www.davidcasal.com
_______________________________________________
PD-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
